We start from practical questions
Articles are organized around questions people search for: how to read an ingredient list, what Alcohol Denat. means, how sunscreen filters appear on labels, or how to separate source checks from personal preferences.
We separate information types
| Type | How we treat it | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory boundary | Show region, condition, and source | CosIng, FDA, Health Canada |
| Formula clue | Describe likely role without overclaiming | Humectant, preservative, UV filter |
| Personal preference | Keep it personal, not universal | Fragrance-free, alcohol-free, custom watchlist |
Tone
We use neutral wording and avoid presenting single ingredients as universally good or bad. When uncertainty exists, the article should explain what to check next.
Medical boundary
This site does not diagnose, treat, or replace a professional. If symptoms are persistent or severe, a qualified professional is the right next step.
Update and correction practice
Pages should be revised when source wording changes, when a product category needs clearer context, or when an article overstates what an ingredient list can prove. Corrections should prefer specific wording over broad fear-based claims.
How the app fits
The app is treated as a product-level review tool, not as a replacement for the content library. Articles explain how to think; the app helps apply that thinking to product records, ingredient tables, source notes, and saved personal rules.
What we avoid
We avoid universal avoid lists, unsupported miracle claims, medical diagnosis, and single-score conclusions that hide the evidence. Cosmetic ingredient reading is strongest when it stays explicit about product type, source quality, and personal context.